October 27, 2007
The Canberra Times

The march goes on for fairness in trials of sexual assault

If you happened to be passing through Civic early last evening you probably saw them. A couple of hundred women marching to the beat of a drum, carrying banners and sporting T-shirts claiming ”It can happen to Any Body”.

But unlike most previous years, there was no screaming, no loud chanting and no angry confrontations with onlookers. How we’ve changed.

For nearly 30 years women around Australia, and the world, have taken to the streets on the last Friday of October to ”Reclaim the Night”. The event grew out of a protest against English police telling women to stay indoors after dark, as there was a rapist on the loose.

In the early days, women marched in their thousands, protesting against all forms of violence against women, in a proud display of independence and autonomy.

My first Reclaim the Night march was as a student in the ’80s, back when women’s anger, once unleashed, was expressed with loud rage. What I had expected would be a fun, collegiate kind of stroll through the city turned ugly when the young women around me took on what looked like a football team of blokes jeering from the side (Canterbury Bulldog cubs, no doubt). With no warning, police, horses and shocking levels of verbal abuse were thrown into the mix. Suddenly we had an ”incident” on our hands.

But that was back then, at a time when it seemed there was plenty of cause to complain. So what about now? The numbers attending Reclaim the Night marches have diminished. Has too the need?

Is the march now little more than a nostalgic event that should be laid to rest in the annals of feminist history? Are we over it? And has the fight to stop violence against women been largely won?

Thanks to the hard work of feminists slogging it out over the past several decades, much has changed: our laws, community awareness and social education. As a result, women’s rights have strengthened.

But some of the hardest things to shift are people’s private and personal, deep-rooted prejudices. And sadly, a report issued two weeks ago by the Australian Institute of Criminology on the attitudes and bias of jurors in sexual assault cases is a stark and shocking reminder of that.

As someone who has spent most of my working life in front of a television camera, I’ve learnt to accept that, no matter what my frown, smile or brow furrow actually meant, it doesn’t matter. Most viewers’ own personal world view and bias will dictate how they read and interpret my gestures. And that’s fine, if we’re only talking about the news and events unrelated to me personally.

But if I was the grief-stricken and devastated victim of a shocking rape, sitting in court giving evidence, how my gestures were interpreted by the jury would be crucial. They would watch how I move, how I talk, noticing how I dress. They would assess whether they believe my tears were real or not, whether my shame seemed befitting. They would listen not to what I said in the witness box, but how I said it. They would look at how I presented myself and make a judgment as to what kind of woman I am. They would hear about my sexual history, number of partners and so forth, and form a view about my morality. And all of this is with total disregard to the actual evidence being presented.

And that’s the point.

Sexual assault is one of the hardest offences to prosecute. The crime often takes place with no witnesses. The perpetrator is often known to the victim. Physical injury is not always evident. The victims do not always scream for help. And in the case of rape, proof of consent is usually just a matter of his word against hers.

According to the recent AIC report, a whopping 70 per cent of sexual assaults are not reported to the police. The reasons are complex and yet obvious. The report also says that of those cases considered strong enough to go to court, only one in 10 results in a guilty verdict. This means nine out of 10 victims of sexual assault leave court with the word ”liar” trailing in their wake.

The near impossibility of getting a guilty verdict is not about evidence or truth, it’s about juror bias. A jury must be convinced beyond reasonable doubt. And when it comes to women and sex, our society is still burdened by deep-rooted and ill-conceived prejudices.

The AIC report found that ”jurors interpret what they see in light of their own beliefs, experiences and expectations”. The report’s author, Dr Natalie Taylor, says jurors don’t make objective judgments about consent and guilt based on the facts presented in court ”because they cannot”. She argues that a juror’s ”pre-trial beliefs” – often formed through misinformation and stereotypical beliefs about how a victim should behave – are what dominate their deliberations.

To prove the point, the AIC conducted 18 mock trials with 210 jurors. All the jury members watched exactly the same sexual assault trial. Two of the mock trials resulted in a not guilty verdict. The remaining 16 couldn’t reach a verdict.

Is sexual violence against women happening less, now that we have stronger laws? No. Is the Reclaim the Night march a bit of an old-fashioned relic? Yes. Do we still need it? You bet ya.

Virginia Haussegger is a Canberra journalist and director of the 50/50 by 2030 Foundation at the University of Canberra.

Related Media

March 5, 2023
Go hug yourself? IWD cause lost in mindless mush
Brace yourself for a barrage of silly slogans and cutesy cupcakes. International Women’s Day is on the way and as...
February 24, 2023
The Woman President: Book Review
The Woman President: Leadership, Law and Legacy for Women Based on Experiences from South and Southeast Asia Ramona Vijayarasa Oxford University Press
February 17, 2023
Trolls are vile, but DFAT should never have posted this video
Let’s get this out of the way first. The one-minute video of Australia’s new Ambassador for Gender Equality, Stephanie Copus...
February 15, 2023
‘Feared and Revered’: women throughout the ages Radio Broadcast
The ‘Feared and Revered’ exhibition, currently on display at the National Museum of Australia, explores goddesses, demons, witches, and female religious figures –...
November 1, 2022
Feminism and the Making of a Child Rights Revolution 1969-1979: Book Review
With a title like this, of course I was going to dive into Feminism and the Making of a Child...
October 2, 2022
Here’s what you need to know about Mahsa Amini and the protests in Iran and around the world
If you can’t hear the echo of women’s anger leaking out of Iran right now, or feel the rumble of...